C&C 27 Association Forum

This Forum is supported by C&C 27 owners like you whose membership in the C&C 27 Association makes possible this Forum and the accompanying site. Thank you, members, for your continuing commitment.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

if you need to reset your password, you will have to confirm the request clicking the URL in the email that you will receive (Just in case check the spam folder)
If you have any problem, please do not hesitate to contact me

#1 Re: General discussion » "E" measurement » 2024-01-04 16:43:42

Mainsail E measurement for the MkII is 9'6" but the boom is (or at least was originally) the same length as the MkI so much longer than the foot of the sail.  The boom for the MkI is already overlength to allow for end-boom sheeting to the traveller at the aft end of the cockpit.  I'd hazard a guess that the MkII's mainsail is ~2' shorter than the boom?

I'd ask Sportech whether the fact the foot of the sail and the boom are different lengths will have an impact on the sail cover, particularly if you're getting a Happy Pac with it's unique aft hoop-like fitting.

Cheers!

#2 Re: General discussion » Autopilot replacement » 2023-10-16 10:59:09

Autohelms weren't really a common thing when the Mk II was built in the early 1970s so whatever's on the boat would have been installed long after the boat left the factory.

Raymarine's the most popular brand around, if it's a tiller you'd be looking for a ST1000 (or possible ST2000) tiller pilot, if it's a wheel then check out their EV-100 wheel autopilot.

Cheers,
Tal

#3 Re: General discussion » Mk III rudder » 2022-04-14 12:47:19

wrapper wrote:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/bfLbuU2WBH6KArGc8

I have added a few more photos showing the full rudder. 

The top part is angled down aft of the rudder shaft.

Thanks wrapper, I suppose the top could've been cut aft of the rudder shaft but I can't imagine why.

It's hard to tell for sure because of perspective, but the leading and trailing edges don't look parallel in this image.  If they're not, then this is definately not an original rudder from a MK III (or any other C&C 27).

mini_IMG_2776-r1.jpg

Cheers,
Tal
ex "Critical Path" 27-3 #632

#4 Re: General discussion » Mk III rudder » 2022-04-10 19:13:12

The top of the rudder in the images appears to have been cut down for the rear half of the blade, whereas the stock Mk III rudder had a flat top.  See attached photo of a stock rudder.

Since there's no shot of the whole rudder I can't tell whether the rest of the rudder blade matches the Mk III's relatively deep and high aspect shape.

Cheers,
Tal
ex "Critical Path" 27-3 #632

mini_20150425-CP-Launch3-2.jpg

#5 Re: General discussion » Mark III Resurrection Underway » 2022-03-27 16:08:46

Forward hatches for all Mk IIIs came from Aktins & Hoyle.  Still in business with parts and technical advice available.  Not cheap but it sure is nice to have them still in business.  They also do hatch rebuilds - I just had the midships hatch on our 35 MKII refurb'd and it looks like new again.

https://www.atkinshoyle.com/

Cheers!

#6 Re: General discussion » C&C 27' MkV for Sale - Night's Watch NYC » 2022-03-10 16:03:54

Double verified!  Night Vision's PO did a very nice job setting this boat up.

Cheers!

#7 Re: General discussion » Spinnaker sheet layout » 2021-12-27 10:17:47

Hi Ronan,

Our 27-3’s spinnaker setup included a pole config’d for end-for-end jibes, along with single sheets and twings run outside on each side.

The twings were led to a block/cleat assembly on the toe rail just behind the midships lifeline stanchion.  There was some load on the stanchion but it was reduced and down low near the base.  The spin sheet blocks were mounted on the toerail about 6’ forward of the transom to minimize load on the aft stanchions when reaching.

The twing line was about 16’ long and continuous.  It ran from one sheet through the block/cleat assembly, over the cabintop then through a similar setup on the other side.  No permanent hardware needed to be mounted on the deck and there were no trip hazards.  The arrangement did require that someone go amidships to release or tension the twings.

I don’t have any closeups on Critical Path, but we used the same arrangement on our next boat and I found a photo of that setup.

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
ex "Critical Path” 27-3 #632

http://www.cc27association.com/f4/img/m … 6-nr5p.jpg


mini_20140900-LOSH6-Rev-Judy-Preston-mod-resize.jpg

mini_IMG_0723-2-mod-resize.jpg

#8 Re: General discussion » Site to shut down very soon » 2021-01-24 03:30:02

David,

Thanks so much for the years of service you've given C&C 27 owners (and the Class Association when it was active) everywhere by mastering this website.  Even though I sold Critical Path six years ago I still drop by to check in occasionally.

All good things must come to an end but the information gathered in this website is irreplaceable, too bad it'll disappear.

All the best!

Cheers,
Tal Wolf

Shark 24 "kraSh" Bay of Quinte Yacht Club
Aloha 30 "Knot Faster" Trident Yacht Club

#9 General discussion » 1976 C&C 27 Mk III for sale "Critical Path" SOLD » 2015-09-18 22:29:11

TalW
Replies: 0

Sold!

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
1976 C&C 27 Mk III #632
"Critical Path"

#10 Re: General discussion » C&C Mark V for sale » 2015-08-25 22:05:21

Different Drummer's a Mk V IB sailed out of Bluffers Park Yacht Club in Scarborough.  Nicely set up for racing (particularly shorthanded).  Scroll down the page at http://ashbridgesbayyachtclub.org/?page_id=428 for the listing.

I have no affiliation, just know the boat and owner...

Cheers,
Tal
C&C 27 #632 Critical Path

#11 Re: General discussion » Favorite sailmakers in the GTA? » 2012-09-17 03:46:07

Hi Alan,

Evolution Sails Toronto is owned and staffed by (most of) the same folks who previously ran Quantum Sails Toronto until 2009.  Most of the same crew were Hood Sails until sometime in the mid 90's - three brand changes in under 20 years.  They've operated lofts out of a few different GTA locations over that time.

Each change has been promoted for improved quality, better performance, and greater technology but I don't think I woulda been happy to be one of the final customers with their prior labels on my sail.  I believe the reality of the last change was that Quantum corporate changed their pricing structure (to the detriment of the local operators) and they were rumoured to be directing more work offshore.

Evolution's roots came from a small US independent in Maryland called Renegade.  When Quantum changed, some of their lofts went to the newly-founded Evolution, along with a few other lofts that'd been other brands before.

When the changeover began, I remember a guy posting something like this on Sailing Anarchy:

North + greed = Sobstad
Sobstad + greed = Quantum
Quantum + greed = Evolution
winner = North

So back to your original question - Quantum's only presence in Canada at this time is in Nova Scotia, but they're still very active worldwide, just not in the GTA part of the universe!

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
Critical Path
C&C 27 MkIII #632

#12 Re: General discussion » Favorite sailmakers in the GTA? » 2012-09-12 04:15:18

Hi Richard,

Full battens offer the sail designer greater opportunity to increase the sail area on the leech and provide good shaping options utlitizing different batten types.  Popular race configurations are one or two full battens at the top and three or two partial battens lower down.  Four full battens are favoured by cruisers because they simplify the task of flaking the sail (especially in conjunction with lazy jacks), and provide increased longetivity because the prevent the sail from fluttering so the the cloth doesn't fatigue as quickly.  However, I don’t think they offer the shaping options of the split batten design.  You’ll find that different sailmakers will recommend different configurations – none are necessarily right or wrong, they just have varying opinions.

I’m not quite sure where to begin regarding sailmakers, so I’ll make the following disclaimer:  I used to work fulltime for a local sail loft that’s no longer in business.  The products we developed are still available from a small independent loft in Nova Scotia (where the owner moved).  As such, I have my own opinions that may or may not be shared by others as to how to choose the best sail value for your use.

Sailmakers typically break down into the following categories:

LOCAL BIGGIES:
These are the lofts you see advertised all the time, offering several quality levels of products, usually manufactured offshore and distributed locally.  Most do service work locally.  Prices are all over the map depending on technology, time of year, and capacity at their offshore manufacturing factories.  This’d be North (Toronto), UK (Toronto), Sobstad (Barrie), Doyle (I think Ed works outta his trunk nowadays!), and Evolution (Toronto, but they’re different because they do design/build many sails locally).

LOCAL INDEPENDENTS:
These typically offer good customer service for the type of customer a 27 buyer is.  Prices and product vary, but don’t fool yourself – there’s no deals out there and you get what you pay for!  Joe Drago (Scarborough), Triton (Port Credit), Sportech (St. Catharines), and KSL (Kingston) design, build, and service their sails locally.

IN BETWEEN:
Bay Sails Haarstick (Hamilton) is sorta in between the two categories above.  It’s a local loft, but most of their sails have been designed and (usually) plotted/cut in the US, then shipped to Hamilton for final assembly.

SAIL BROKERS:
Mail order (Lee, Rolly Tasker, Hyde) and online (FX, Atlantic, etc.) sail suppliers are typically built offshore to heavy specs.  Many people mistake heavy with high quality.  My recommendation would be to choose these products if cost is king, and avoid these products if performance is valuable.

One little-known industry secret is that some lofts source their less expensive and/or low technology sails from a third party subcontractor.  Design and quality should be similar to what they would’ve made themselves, but an outfit called “China Sail Factory” is a shadow manufacturing facility for many biggies and independents.  If the source of your sail is important to you, ask where it will be made and by whom.

My recommendation would be to decide what type of sail you’re looking for, send a request to as many lofts as possible, and see what you hear back.  You’ll receive a whole gamut of responses, from glossy brochures with lotsa glitz and technical info, to simple descriptions of the options available, to a phone call or email with price only!  Don’t be dismayed – just work your way through, ask more questions, and find a sailmaker who you trust and feel comfortable talking to and working with.  I can assure you that unless you’re sailing at a world-class level (and none of us 27 flunkies are!), the person you develop and relationship and choose to work with is more important than the brand label on the sail.

After 15 years of trying sails and sailmakers from Hood, North, Doyle, Sobstad, and US, I finally found a sailmaker who’s personality made me a comfortable and valuable client.  He subsequently became a lifelong friend and even my employer during a few lean years.  THAT’S the kinda guy you want to work with!  So go out there and find him (or her as the case may be!).

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
Critical Path
C&C 27 MkIII #632

#13 Re: General discussion » Hard Coated Dacron for a C&C Mainsail » 2011-11-22 00:31:40

Hi Hugh,

What are your priorities for the new sail?  Choosing Dacron would suggest price and longetivity are key factors, but the resin coating has an impact on both those items that could eliminate the cost/performance benefits.

Something like Dimension's SF260HTP could make a great sail, but I wouldn't use such a firm finish woven cloth for the mainsail due to the handling requirements of the material.

Since the mast extrusion will only accept flat slides, there's no simple way to convert to boltrope.  Instead, you'd have to remove the slide stop and feed/remove the slides each time you raise/lower the sail.  Even temporarily allowing the cloth to flake as it's lowered would break down the coating rapidly - the material's very crisp!  And our booms are so high above the deck that it could be a struggle to contain the sail when it's in transition.

I'd suggest the same cloth, but without the HTP plus firm finish, would be the best practical high performance choice for a Dacron mainsail.  Another alternative would be the newer woven cloths suitable for triradial construction, but their durability has not yet been proven and attempts to develop similar cloths in the past were not very successful (I speak from personal experience on that subject!).

FYI, in general a mainsail made of firm finish should be priced about halfway between an entry medium quality dacron and a crosscut Kevlar laminate sail, and about the same price as a crosscut Pentex laminate sail.

Sail purchase decisions can become quite complicated with so many options but I'd explore other performance alternatives.

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 MkIII #632

#14 Re: General discussion » backstay adjuster » 2011-03-01 01:21:16

Hi Stephane,

Critical Path has a single point centre chainplate like yours and our old Dermac wheel adjuster that gave up the ghost a few years ago.  We twisted on a conventional turnbuckle and kept sailing while deciding what to do next.

Like Dean suggested, we ran with a wrench and screwdriver combo, but I gotta tell you, that’s even slower and less efficient than the wheel was.  Decided I wasn’t going to spend good money on another inefficient adjuster (i.e. wheel or handle) but flipped when I saw the prices of Wichard’s ratcheting mechanical adjuster.  Looked at splitting the backstay, but after adding up the cost of new backstay plus split fittings, block and tackle, and new chainplates (I choose not to do structural work like chainplate design and installation myself) it was close to the cost of the ratchet adjuster and not really the route I wanted to take.  Whatever you choose, do NOT relocate your lower backstay terminations to the toe rail or cast end fittings – that’s a recipe for disaster.

I’ve decided to go another route, and just picked up a Sailtec integral hydraulic adjuster (http://www.sailtec.com/hydraulic_integral_adjusters.php).  It’s not cheap either, but retains the original backstay/chainplate configuration, allows me to keep the MOB pole on the backstay (instead of sticking it off the stern pulpit – man is that a fugly solution!), and looks kinda sexy and retro!  Don’t plan on pumping tons of pressure, just enough to keep the forestay taught and the head sliding door operational!

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path, Mk III #632

#15 Re: General discussion » Barber hauler for spinnaker » 2011-02-17 03:30:21

Hi Alan,

How's about a real-life application?  I've used Harken 009's as spinnaker turning blocks on Critical Path since 1996 without a block problem (did blow up a Merriman snap shackle once, but that's another story!).

Don't worry about the ratchet direction issue.  It simply means the ratchet knob thingy's on the top of one block and the bottom of the other - it's never been an issue for us!

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 Mk III #632

#16 Re: General discussion » Barber hauler for spinnaker » 2011-02-02 04:47:18

Hi Stephane,

We haven’t encountered any problems when lowering the chute with twing blocks captive in the spin sheets.  The keys to a successful system are to make sure the blocks run easily, and that the line can’t run freely out of the side deck block (that’s one of the reasons I’d like to try David’s suggestion of a continuous line).

I’m not particularly keen on the Harken system you’ve found for two reasons.  First off, the double purchase is overkill for our needs and the added line plus the double traveler block is too much weight for the spin sheet of a 27 to bear.  Secondly, leading the line from a block on the rail to a cleat on the cabin top or coaming results in what can become a serious tripping hazard in a high traffic zone.  When we simplified the deck layout several years ago, the crew and I decided the danger factor wasn’t worth the convenience of leading the line to the cockpit or the reduced cost of the parts so we converted to forward cleating.

David’s absolutely correct that the blocks don’t need to be ball-bearing for this application, but having seen Barton equipment blow up (or stop functioning as expected) I would never add a piece of it on my boat.  Harken kit can get pricey, but it’s engineered elegantly and tends to work as advertised longer/better than most other brands, so personally I choose Harken products.  Your mileage may vary!

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 Mk III #632

#17 Re: General discussion » Barber hauler for spinnaker » 2011-01-27 23:18:30

Hi Stephane,

What you saw in a race last week (boy, am I envious – all I saw last week were snowbanks!) is the setup I use – a dedicated twing line system.  Blocks with side opening mechanisms that’re only rigged occasionally used to be more common – I had a nice set of Fredrickson blocks on a previous (bigger) boat but they were too heavy and cumbersome for a 27.

I’ve seen some other very small side-opening blocks about the size of Harken’s bullets (RWO perhaps?) but they look very light construction and I wouldn’t use them.  At the other end of the spectrum, Barton make some “lightweight snatch blocks” but they’re too big and heavy for our use too – check them out at http://www.bartonmarine.com/products-snatch-blocks.asp.  Ronstan used to make these nifty-looking green and red nylon snap shackles that looked like a great idea but didn’t work all that well either – I notice they’re not even in the Ronstan catalog anymore.

The advent of lightweight ball bearing blocks like the 40mm carbo’s I use add very little weight to the line when left loose (most of the time), but are ready for action whenever needed.  If it’s drifting conditions we may not run the spin sheets through the blocks but still have them rigged and ready to re-run the sheets if needed.

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 Mk III #632

#18 Re: General discussion » Barber hauler for spinnaker » 2011-01-27 06:11:05

Barber Haulers, Tweakers, Twing Lines - they all refer to the same purpose in this application, namely controlling the location of spinnaker sheet and or guy lead by bringing it lower and closer to a midships location.

Another benefit for those of us sailing point-to-point races as opposed to windward/leewards is the ability to bring the guy down to deck level when the spin poles at or near the forestay.  Gives better leverage and much easier on the stanchions!

Before our deck reconfiguration, I used to run the sheet/guy through small Harken bullet blocks, which were led through big bullets snap shackled to the rail amidships (just behind the stanchion by the aft lower shroud), then aft to a cam cleat on the combing so we could control from the cockpit.  Tried a few variations on this theme but none solved the tripping hazard of running a (sometimes) loaded line across the side deck to the combing.

Now we run 40mm Harken Carbo Airblocks - #2650 at the end, through a #2646 that's snap-shackled to the rail and shock-corded to the lifeline.  I used to run the tails loosely back into the cockpit but like David's suggestion of s single continuous line and think I'll try that out this year!

The Harken blocks I use can be found at:
http://www.harkenstore.com/uniface.urd/sccyspw1.eShowPage?CATALOG=409Z56LC7FV66&CATEGORY=409Z56LC4WD9M

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 Mk III #632

#19 Re: General discussion » Racing Sails - What are people buying, from whom, and how much? » 2011-01-21 01:17:01

Hi michael,

Let me begin with the disclaimer that I’m associated with one of the lofts identified in David’s post above.

In terms of #1 genoas, I’d suggest that the typical 27 owner’s expectations would be best met with a laminate sail.  Dacron (actually woven Polyester) is still an effective material for mainsails and special purpose foresails, but your workhorse genoa really needs the horsepower and grunt of a laminate cloth to maximize efficiencies.  In simple terms, laminates offer two main benefits over woven cloth:  strength to maintain designed shape longer, and lightness to respond to lighter winds more effectively and reduce weight.  They can also be effectively recut after a few seasons to recreate the original design shape.  On the down side for laminates, the cost differential is not insignificant, they may have unique handling requirements, and their ultimate lifespan is shorter than woven polyester.

It’s a veritable minefield to compare one loft’s offerings to another.  No single product is inherently faster than another, so each owner needs to determine for themselves which construction technique they feel comfortable investing in.  Keep in mind there can be issues of durability and longevity when comparing different laminate materials (polyester, Pentex, Aramid [Kevlar], Carbon, etc.) and construction techniques (paneled vs. string sail, crosscut vs. triradial, etc.).

I’ve sailed the Path since 1996 and am on my third suit of sails.  We don’t have an aggressive racing schedule i.e. the sails aren’t used nearly as much as some club racers, and I also spend a lot of time racing OPBs (other peoples’ boats), so the sails are kept in very good condition.  There’s a wee chance it may have something to do with being in the business that I keep the sails in top shape too!

I just converted to laminate for the mainsail and would probably have stuck with a woven sail with very high quality cloth - the move to laminate was due to trying out some new cloth and promoting our products more than actually feeling it’ll be a better product.  We’ll just have to wait and see what the results show!

One of the reasons C&C’s 27 remains a popular boat for racers and cruisers alike is because it’s easy to sail and has a nice fat groove that suits many different sailing styles.  In my opinion, what’s more important than “what sail to buy, from whom, and how much” is to establish a trusting and lasting relationship with your sailmaker.  The benefits of working in a partnership are more important than which product you end up buying right now.  That's been my experience - I started out as a customer of Performance Sails ten years ago before getting involved with the operation in 2005.  I am no longer involved in the day-to-day operations of the loft but still help out whenever I can.

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path
1976 Mk. III #632

#20 Re: General discussion » Mk III Racing Sails NOT for Sale » 2010-04-18 23:47:23

Hi John,

All three sails are still available for sale.  Email sent...

Cheers,
Tal

#22 General discussion » Mk III Racing Sails NOT for Sale » 2010-03-01 08:13:09

TalW
Replies: 3

Keeping the boat so keeping the sails!

Cheers,
Tal
Critical Path, 1976 Mk III #632

#23 Re: General discussion » 150 jib dimensions » 2008-02-07 11:24:56

Hi Tom,

Here's one more set of measurements for you, from a kevlar #1 I had built a few years ago for Critical Path (I = 37.00', J = 11.75'):

Luff = 36.75' (full hoist on a headfoil - Rod's measurements are close but not quite max!)
Leech = 35.54'
Foot = 18.48'
LP = 17.74'
Clew Height = 2" (this design dimension is the height on the horizontal above the tack)

The sail had an LP of 151% (with the luff tape added it came to 153%, the max without penalty under PHRF-LO when it was built).

The sail had a deep foot skirt and the clew ended up about 15" above the deck sheeted in hard when new.

If you're interested, I'll be designing a new 155% for the Path in the next month or so, and would be happy to add those numbers as well...

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
Critical Path
1976 C&C 27 MkIII #632

#24 Re: General discussion » C&C 27 Association Spring Meeting » 2007-05-15 00:17:22

Wednesday?  WEDNESDAY??  Don't 'cha know some of us race on Wednesdays?!

Sorry I'll miss it.  Have a good one!

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
Critical Path
1976 C&C 27 Mk III #632

#25 Re: General discussion » Mark V Regatta at Barrie Yacht Club » 2007-05-09 02:39:54

Interest in Mk V fleet racing has declined at BYC and Lake Simcoe in general over the last two years.  One boat sold last year, another this spring, two more currently for sale.

Cheers,
Tal Wolf
Critical Path
C&C 27 Mk III, Hull #632

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB