C&C 27 Association Forum

This Forum is supported by C&C 27 owners like you whose membership in the C&C 27 Association makes possible this Forum and the accompanying site. Thank you, members, for your continuing commitment.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

if you need to reset your password, you will have to confirm the request clicking the URL in the email that you will receive (Just in case check the spam folder)
If you have any problem, please do not hesitate to contact me

#551 Re: General discussion » Winter storage » 2007-02-13 00:15:55

Laurent:

If you want to do some preventive care and no surveyor is available in the region, consider buying a moisture meter of your own and checking your decks. I think they're about US $200 from the online places, which is about what you'd spend on visit from a surveyor. I know there are other sailboats in the area - perhaps someone would like to join you in buying one.

The other thing you could do for prevention (easy as you're inside) is pull the hardware off the deck, remove the balsa core surrounding the holes and fill with epoxy (described here). That would give you some assurance that a problem won't appear in the future.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#552 Re: General discussion » Winter storage » 2007-02-12 02:27:09

If you have wet balsa core, storage inside may help if the penetration isn't too extensive (and particularly if you remove the fittings at the point of entry to ease evaporation). If penetration is extensive or if there is already delamination, it probably won't do much good.

Having said that, I'd have to suggest that my comments here cannot be much help (and might be misleading) as I don't knowing the extent of your problem. Why not invest a couple of hundred bucks in having a proper surveyor check your decks and recommend a course of action? Stitch in time and all that.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#553 Re: General discussion » Are C&C decks more prone to delamination? » 2007-02-07 06:37:50

Some time back, I had a conversation with one of the early members of the C&C design team about his own boat. He had by chance met one of the foremen who built Corvettes at Morch Marine in the early days of C&C and this fellow told him that, basically, the builders were winging it through those years. No one had built fibreglass boats before, so they were learning on the job. Fibreglass appeared to be waterproof, plywood is strong, so plywood encapsulated in glass should be a perfect combination of strength and cost (remembering that one of the goals of glass boatbuilding is to lower cost).

We know better now - the glass encapsulation that keeps the water away from stringers also holds in any water that manages to find its way past the glass (not to mention hiding the subsequent rot), whereas if it were just wood, the water would dry, no problem. But it often took ten years or more for some of these issues to start showing up - I well remember being told that examination of collision-damaged boats showed that water in balsa laminate would not migrate beyond the point of penetration, so early cases were treated as isolated incidents - and people confidently kept building boats the same way.

Another issue is that contemporary manufacturing accounting practices virtually mandated some choices that we find bizarre - but that's too complicated a subject to go into here.

The long and the short of it is that, as the preceding message has it, a surveyor is essential.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#554 Re: General discussion » compass installation » 2007-01-28 01:24:27

Have you read the wiring diagram on the Sea Change page? It indicates that there should be a push/pull switch somewhere for the light (on the same breaker circuit as the blower, but separately switched).

Also, please read the page on HIN's in Black Arts. That should clarify the numbers issue.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#555 Re: General discussion » Are C&C decks more prone to delamination? » 2007-01-25 01:04:20

> most have not had anything other than a few intrusions at handrail mounts and other screw holes

Do I read this correctly as defining this as a minor problem? Intrusions at handrail mounts appear to be the worst problem, perhaps because the coachroof flexes there, perhaps because the water can weep down from there and perhaps because it's such a bother to fix that people put it off.

Look at the Critical Path story in Black Arts and see how much of the damage is adjacent to or below the handrails. There's a boat from my club at Wigger's yard this winter having extensive repairs around the handrails and there was a 30 there three years ago, same problem. As I've mentioned before, when I was looking for a boat, I was aboard a very nice-looking one whose decks below the windows were so delaminated that the stanchions swung inboard to meet you as you walked that part of the deck.

I had my handrails off the year I bought the boat because they leaked. Regrettably, I didn't epoxy the holes then, but if I see so much as a drop out of them, knowing what I do now, they're coming off and getting the full treatment.

Incidentally, I mention above that I pulled my deck organizers this fall. I wasn't looking forward to this because when you back-fill a hole that runs right through the deck, the epoxy always loosens the tape that I've used in the past to block the lower hole, so the epoxy runs through.

This time, I tried two materials to block the lower hole. One was blue insulating foam (Styrofoam SM, carved into a tapered-plug shape), the other was a foam material called "gimp" (I think), a round, spongey foam material that is sold as a backing material to force into large cracks before you put latex caulk in the crack.

Both worked reasonably well, allowing none of the epoxy to escape. The gimp was easier to work with. As with the work done on deck tracks (Black Arts), I used an epoxy syringe and tape around the upper hole to minimize mess and simplify clean-up.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#556 Re: General discussion » roller furling » 2007-01-11 01:05:23

What I have on my cover are finished zippers with moulded ends rather than the continuous ones that lofts normally use. Those are rubbish and very likely to pop open halfway along their length. Originally I looked askance at the multiple zippers (despite my loathing for continuous zippers), but this worked out well. Ron managed to arrange them so they provide an opening for the sheets right at the clew, so they can be led outside the sock and tied to the lifelines. (So that's one other measurement that anyone ordering a sock ought to provide - the distance between the clew and the tack when rolled.)

After a season of using the sock, the convenience of one zipper vs three is neither here nor there and the break between zippers is invisible unless you're looking for it.

As to why people put roller furling on, I did it for safety's sake. I got caught east of Cobourg in a rapidly rising wind while bringing the boat home by myself; this gave me a very long hard sailing day, nothing serious, but it made me think about what might have happened had it blown any harder.

The roller furling genoa was great at first but even the lightweight UV material ruined that one's shape in light air. For us, the sock is a good compromise between sail shape and convenience.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#557 Re: General discussion » Prop Strut - MK III » 2007-01-10 08:28:30

There was a fellow on this forum who lost his boat to Katrina. He might still have the p-bracket. Search for "Katrina". 

Alternatively, take the pieces to a moulding shop and see if they can cast a new one (or even repair the one you have).

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#558 Re: General discussion » roller furling » 2007-01-08 00:38:07

The sock has a 3 zippers (super-long zippers are v. expensive - using a series of them keeps down cost and has no downside that I'm aware of). On the other side are a set of laces that you snug up once the sock is up; this prevents it from flapping in the wind, chafing itself and the sail.

A whisker pole is nice for off-wind sailing; absence of the weight of a UV cover improves sail shape on all points of sail in light air.

I got mine in dark blue Sunbrella from Triton Sails in Mississauga (905-891-8166). I won't quote price because this was a first for him, but I think I can say that it was a fraction of what a friend paid a major loft for a comparable product. To make one, he needed the sail's luff length and the circumference of the normally rolled sail.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#559 Re: General discussion » Just purchased hull #180 question? » 2007-01-07 04:06:17

Mike, I think if you examine the boat with the in-line shrouds and babystay, you'll find that these are an owner modification. The 27 next to me has this setup and although it's been neatly done, it's clearly post-factory. It's also a modification that's not allowed by our Association rules, but since the change doesn't appear to confer a benefit, no one much objects.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#560 Re: General discussion » roller furling » 2007-01-07 03:28:49

I have a Harken system and like it. The split drum part means you can remove that easily for racing. As far as I know, you have to remove your headstay to install any system.

Most (not all) systems fit over the existing wire, but I was advised that a furling system will expose any weakness in the existing headstay; better to replace it. Mine was C$90.00 - no big deal. Assembling the furler over the new headstay and getting it on the boat wasn't hard, but you have to follow the instructions carefully. Read three times, dry-fit once, cut once, dry-fit once more, apply Lok-Tite and assemble for real - I'm sure you know the deal. Do not do as an acquaintance did, who said, "I'm a Professional Engineer - I can figure this out as I go along." No sympathy.

I had a new headsail made for the furler; after a year, my sailmaker applied a very expensive, lightweight UV cover over the areas that had been discoloured by sunlight. Despite the light weight of this material, its weight ruined the sail for light air. Accordingly, the replacement sail was given a Sunbrella sock that we zip up over the sail, hoisting it with the chute halyard. Works like a charm.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#561 Re: General discussion » misc. musings » 2007-01-06 03:09:14

A liner will trap air to some extent, minimizing the temperature differential that causes condensation. The C&C liner does provide some rigidity, particularly in the V-berth, but that's not a major function as it is in some (70's Ericcsons and contemporary French boats use structural liners). Most of the strength comes from the major components themselves (balsa core helps make the deck more rigid without weight).

The downside of a liner is that it can provide a spot for mould to grow. Keep your boat well ventilated.

Perhaps someone could provide you a precise laminate schedule from his South Shore build report, but I know that C&C hulls were gelcoat, a thin layer of chopper-gun to prevent print-through, then hand-laid glass, mostly roving for strength). It's grossly over-built by contemporary standards.

Don't listen to people who want you to beef up your boat - yacht club bars are full of Nervous Nellies who want to convert their boats into cast-iron boilers. Look at the picture of Lark in 27 Tales - slammed down on a rock ledge and what do you get? A bent rudder stock and scuffed gelcoat. Try that with a Beneteau or Hunter and you'd be picking the boat out of your clothing. Remember:
- "All amateurs overbuild," - George Cassian, aerospace engineer and the materials-and-structure "C" of "C&C",
- The sailors who died in the infamous '79 Fastnet were those who abandoned their yachts. I think I'm correct in saying that all the abandoned yachts were recovered afloat, and these were lighter boats than a 27. The yacht that was abandoned in A Perfect Storm was found on a New Jersey beach, essentially undamaged, and returned to her owner. Lesson: fibreglass boats are incredibly tough, so much so that it might make sense to forbid boats to carry life-rafts in races like the Fastnet so people don't panic and bail out. Yachts' major weak point is through-hulls and hoses, an issue any intelligent sailor can manage.

Their other major weak point is sailors - unless you have the supreme bad fortune to run into the sort of century storm that turns up in Heavy-Weather Sailing or have someone run over you, all the literature of sailing disasters points to bad decision-making - but isn't that the prime ingredient in every human disaster?

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#562 Re: General discussion » Re-Epoxy the Bottom » 2007-01-02 03:59:54

Just as a matter of interest, who was the surveyor?

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#563 Re: General discussion » Re-Epoxy the Bottom » 2006-12-25 04:50:36

Before you let a doctor chop your head off to cure your dandruff, it's a good idea to get a second opinion. And before embarking on a wholesale stripping and re-epoxying of the bottom, it might be a good idea to speak to the tech specialists at Interlux.

You might have an age-related breakdown – though there are enough epoxy cold-moulded boats from 20 years ago still sailing to make me question this diagnosis – but I'll wager that your problem is just something to do with the wet carpet (as in, the hull not having been sufficiently dry in the way of the carpet when the Interprotect was put on). If I were you, I'd sand just the pad areas to bare gelcoat right now, leave them to dry over the off-season, then re-coat the pad areas before launch. If the problem recurs, you know you've got a real problem. But if it doesn't – and I'll bet it won't – you'll have saved a fair bit of time and trouble.

Tangaroa in NZ? Merry Xmas to you too.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#564 Re: General discussion » Racing the 27 Mk3 » 2006-12-19 01:06:32

If you use the Search function on this site with a term like "race" or "racing" you'll find page after page of discussion of sails, sail selection, gear, crew placement, deck tracks, you name it. This will probably answer a good many questions, including a few that it has not yet occurred to you to ask.

This is not to discourage you from asking questions. Rather, it's to encourage you to use the considerable resource that people have created on this site. Dip into that, then get back to us with anything that remains.

Merry Xmas

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#565 General discussion » Rule changes to include Mk V's » 2006-12-12 00:35:44

davidww1
Replies: 6

Revised Class Rules: Proposed revisions to the Association class rules were put forward for discussion at our Fall Meeting on 12 Dec., 06, by Steve Reid and Jim Wente. Rules for the Marks I, II, III and IV are unchanged; the proposals  add specifications for the Mark V. See the revised rules <a href="http://www.cc27association.com/pdf/27rules_rev_MkV-1.doc">here</a> (in Word .doc format with proposed additions marked in red).

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#566 General discussion » Association Fall Meeting » 2006-11-23 08:25:09

davidww1
Replies: 0

Fall Meeting: C&C 27 Fall meeting will be held at Etobicoke Yacht Club on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 19:00 hours. All C&C 27 owners, spouses and crew are welcome whether they are members at present or not.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#567 General discussion » SpeedSeal for water pump » 2006-11-07 08:34:13

davidww1
Replies: 0

Since the issue of water pumps is in the air, I thought I would favour the forum with a screed that's been festering in my mind for a while.

Towser used to have an A4 that had been retrofitted with a fresh-water cooling system that included a belt-driven pump for the sea water on the forward end of the block. This pump ate impellers and it was a real hassle to replace them. Accordingly, when I heard about the <a href="http://www.speedseal.com/speedseal.html" target="blank">Speed Seal</a>, I bought one for this pump (I think it was about $70). If you're not familiar with Speed Seals, they are a heavy brass plate with a groove for an o-ring machined in the face. Because the plate is so rigid, they can be held securely with just 4 knurled nuts that you can run up with your finger-tips. Now, instead of a major hassle, it was something I could do without looking at the pump.

So I bought one for the pump on the body of the A4 that pumps the internal coolant. Unfortunately, this one leaked enough to visibly lower the coolant level over 20 minutes running. I tried everything suggested by Speed Seal's owner to remedy the problem. He sent me a second plate to try. Same problem. Same diagnostics, no luck.

Then the A4 died.

Well the new engine has a pump too, so I thought a Speed Seal might be a good idea here. I called the Speed Seal guy and asked him, since the A4 plate never worked despite our best efforts, would he consider replacing it with one for my diesel?

The answer: No. Since I had installed it, he wouldn't be able to sell it to someone else. But it was only by installing it that I was able to find out that it didn't work. Didn't matter - how could he run a company that kept delivering bits of "kit" to people over and over again without getting paid? Forget it. End of discussion.

So if the discussion of impellers now ongoing moves you to consider a fast-change solution, consider this: Speed Seal scored one out of three overall, zero out of two for the A4. And Don Moyer of <a href="http://www.moyermarine.com" target="blank">Moyer Marine</a>, who has always been a friend to A4 owners (when I had a little issue with his A4 alarm kit, he worked on the issue and he solved it), has a similar product. His almost certainly works.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#568 Re: General discussion » Mainsail Outhaul » 2006-11-06 11:54:28

Pictures:
(moved to Black Arts, Internal Outhaul)

If you wanted to run a length of wire through the boom for the outhaul, the inboard casting seems also to be designed to accommodate a narrow sheave. You could then set up a multipart tackle between the gooseneck and the base of the mast to make it easier to adjust.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#569 Re: General discussion » Mainsail Outhaul » 2006-11-03 00:08:08

Can't offer photos, but my Mk IV's boom (which also had no proper outhaul) has a vertical channel that seemed purpose-made for an outhaul sheave. I was able to find an alloy sheave with oilite bearing of about 1/4" wide, 1" to 1 1/4" diameter that slid in there nicely.

Once I removed the casting from the boom, I was able to drill an appropriate sized hole for the retaining pin. A length of wire (probably 3/32" or thereabouts) has a shackle swaged on one end, a Harken block on the other. A line (3/8"?) that is dead-ended at the gooseneck end runs aft to the block, then forward to an exit block mounted on the underside of the boom at the gooseneck. From there the line goes aft to a cam cleat. The block in the boom is also attached to a length of shock cord, to provide a positive releasing force.

Line sizes aren't really important as the loads aren't high. The wire was sized for the sheave and the rope was sized to be easy on the hand.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#570 Re: General discussion » Sail Number » 2006-10-31 23:41:44

You are drawing inferences from somewhat dissimilar entities. One-design classes such as your 242, Dragons, Etchells, etc., normally bear a number assigned by the class association as authorized by the national sailing organization. There are a few 27's that have hull numbers on their sails (my neighbour, Escapade, hull no. 42, is one), but most of those who race, race in mixed offshore fleets where the requirement is a number that the owner (not the builder) obtains from the national sailing organization - see http://www.sailing.ca/competitive/regulations/numbers.shtm or http://www.ussailing.org/offshore/SailNoSys.htm .

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#571 Re: General discussion » Interior flooring » 2006-10-27 00:27:45

One of the neatest solutions to the cabin sole issue that I've seen was on a Mk II with the bare gelcoated sole with a non-skid pattern. The owners, however, had a nice little oriental runner that they laid down in port. The best of both worlds.

The current standard "teak-&-holly" sole is something of a travesty, being pretty but a skating rink when wet or mucky. (I know whereof I speak - I was in major pain for about a week after an overnight race, during which I slipped on the varnished cabin sole of a 34 owing to the presence of a slurry of water and crushed potato chips.) Originally, real teak-&-holly was made with the harder holly standing 1/16" proud of the surface and only the teak varnished, making an attractive but effective non-skid.

I thought of this when doing my sole, which had been destroyed by the previous owner - gouged then sanded through in a number of places. I contemplated not replacing it after I took it up, mostly for the sake of the non-skid qualities, but I figured that it would be as much work to deal with all the screw holes as to replace it, plus I'd have to find a runner, and I hate shopping for carpet.

I also don't like the way that water pools between the wood and the fibreglass - all you need is about half a cup and it's squelch, squelch, squelch until the stuff evaporates.

The solution I adopted when replacing my sole was to stop the wood at the "door" to the galley. The rectangle represented by the galley is now floored with Dri-deck or whatever it's called - the ribbed material that's normally sold to floor your cockpit. (I also made holes under the companion steps to drain water away to the bilge). Fortuitously, this material is the same thickness as the "teak-&-holly" ply. Stopping the wood at this point also allowed me to replace the sole without having to remove the teak trim on the settees.

What we now have is a not unreasonable compromise. The galley is totally non-skid, so you can stand there with some security. The settee area is a potential skating rink, but we seldom walk around there when sailing (and when someone is on the way to the head, they can hang on). And of course, there's no squelching.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#572 Re: General discussion » Interior flooring » 2006-10-25 08:15:14

Barry:

If I were refinishing, I think I would try to lift the old finish with stripper and a cabinet scraper - anything to reduce the risk of sanding through the veneer. Pull out the bilge cover and you'll see how thin it is. If you're using "normal" (as opposed to fibreglass-safe) stripper, put something on the surrounding gelcoat surfaces to protect them.

The only reason I used epoxy is because I was replacing the original wood floor. I felt it was imperative to seal the underside thoroughly and the supplier suggested that it would be better to do both to stabilize the wood. I don't think I would bother with epoxy if just refinishing.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

PS I didn't use stain.

#573 Re: General discussion » Interior flooring » 2006-10-24 23:46:56

I had to replace the wood floor on Towser. I sealed both sides with penetrating epoxy (vile stuff). Once the floor was down, I finished the upper side with a Minwax floor urethane. The urethane is harder than the epoxy and provides UV protection.

Be careful sanding &#150; the teak-and-holly veneer is paper-thin.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#574 Re: General discussion » Cutlass Bearing » 2006-10-21 08:30:50

I replaced my cutless bearing last spring, so my memory of the job is fairly fresh.

My p-bracket (what you call the shaft support) has two allen screws in line with the shaft on its port side. Once those were out, I was able to cut the bearing shell in two places and pound the cutless bearing with a hammer and screwdriver until it fell out. This is apparently the approved way of doing this. Once you have done this, you will doubtless locate the set screws.

The sawzall sounds a bit brutal, because the p-bracket isn't very thick, so you don't want to cut any farther than necessary (I sort of overdid it the first time I did the job, but that boat is now someone else's problem). I cut my cutless bearing with a fine hacksaw, inspecting the cut every few strokes.

Putting a new bearing in is fairly easy. You need either a bearing insertion tool, or a piece of threaded rod with two locked nuts and a thick washer on one end. Chamfer the end of the bearing you want to insert in the bracket, then pass your threaded rod through the bearing and p-bracket. Put a washer and nut on the end. Position the bearing at the end of the p-bracket and tighten the nut to squeeze the cutless bearing into the bracket.

As you have already taken the paint off your p-bracket, it probably wouldn't hurt to heat it up a bit - brass and bronze expand tremendously, which would ease insertion.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

#575 Re: General discussion » Cradle » 2006-10-18 23:31:23

There is now a brief section in Black Arts giving dimensions of a cradle.

David Weatherston
Towser, Toronto
C&C 27 Mk IV

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB