This Forum is supported by C&C 27 owners like you whose membership in the C&C 27 Association makes possible this Forum and the accompanying site. Thank you, members, for your continuing commitment.
You are not logged in.
Is 1.5 GPM a slow rate? I guess I'll find out when I fire up the engine and energize the detector circuit at the lowest setting. The Atomic 4 water pump flow curve chart that I have show sthese flow rates for 800 RPM (I am interpolating a hand-drawn graph):
0 PSI - 2.6 GPM
8.7 PSI - 1.8 GPM
17.3 PSI - 0.6 GPM
26 PSI - 0 GPM
Since the radiator cap from Moyer is spec'd to 7 PSI (their online catalogue), then I presume the coolant system pressurizes to less than 7 PSI, which means the flow rates at idle will be greater than 1.5 GPM.
I know this doesn't help you be sure about the Yanmar diesel, but thought others may find this information of some use. Warning: I am not an expert, just a DIY amateur so, reader, verify the data yourself if you use any of this.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
David, is the raw water pumped by a specific water pump model? I have the flow specs for the Oberdorfer and Moyer pumps. Aqualarm might know too. 1.5 GPM is a pretty slow flow rate for engines of this size, I would imagine.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
Yes, I got a wiring diagram from them. The flow detector switch is normally closed and wired to the ignition switch so it is powered when the ignition switch is on. The alarm sounds until flow gets up over the set point. At first installation, the user slides the adjustable collar during idle to just below the point where the alarm sounds (switch opens). Just need to pick up a buzzer, wires, connectors and if desired an LED warning light, if that full kit is not available.
Update: I found a supplier for the complete kit David found on the Aqualarm website (same local SM outlet). Comes with a nicely labelled LED light in addition to its own little buzzer. This alarm is in addition to the oil/water temp alarm kit I've just installed. Should be quite a noisy show every time I turn on the engine now.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
Looked into this a bit more at my local Stright-MacKay outlet. The device is made by Aqualarm. Aqualarm's website has more detail. Requires also purchasing an alarm buzzer, figuring out how to wire the detector, purchasing a buzzer, and adjusting the device to the coolant flow rates produced in a particular boat's system. I emailed Aqualarm about our Atomic 4 and they advised their 1" model, part 10233, which will adjust down to 1.5 GPM. I'm not sure about wiring: has anyone installed one of these in a C&C 27?
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I didn't find the file for our boat to be of more than some historical interest. I guess our boat was a pretty simple order at the time. No useful construction details, for example.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I second this one. Got that t-shirt too, in a previous boat. Fortunately, I had just installed a sensitive digital termperature system which save the machinery, but it is much better to be alerted sooner to a flow problem. I am just installing a completely revised cooling system, and this device is on the list.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
David, My error entirely. Thanks for keeping an eye on it.
Cheers to all for Christmas. I painted the engine red yesterday - just in time for Santa, although that was a pleasant coincidence.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
Yup. So the correct dimension is linear midship on the waterline, which of course would be much less than 25 feet, and so 21 feet makes sense. Doh.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
Does anyone have any measures or estimates of the deck and below waterline hull surface areas for painting a C&C 27? I very roughly got 275 sq ft for the deck and 200 for the hull, but the irregular surfaces make my estimate very rough. The Interlux formula for wetted surface area for a 27.3' length by 9.2 ft beam gives 213 sq ft.
Indoors all day thanks to this noreaster, so plenty of time for planning. Can't even get to the boatshed.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
"I cannot comment intelligently on any of the other variations, except to say that if your waterline length is 25 feet, you have entirely too much stuff on board.'
Hmm, I double checked David, now the boat is indoors in the shop: the length along the bottom edge of the oiriginal red gelcoat bootstripe on our Mk II is indeed 25 ft, so the mystery persists.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
When I have to pull the Atomic 4, I'll be builiding that gadget. Great idea.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I went through this all summer. Finally realized the best solution is a 3/4" seacock/throughull/tailpipe. Just use stepdown bushings to get to half inch hose after the inline strainer, if you use one.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
The curators sent me a list of their C&C 27 holdings up to 1974. It isn't easy deciding what to ask them to send for my 1974 "Mark 2". (David, Thanks for your clarification about the way C&C used the term "mark" inside their operation. The curators were very interested in that tidbit too. I'll use numeral "1, 2" for our consumer Mark, and Roman numeral "I" for their internal Mark).
These are the design terms used in the list:
"Mark 22 I" 22' 3" L.W.L.
"Mark 21 I" 21' 0" L.W.L.
"Mark I"
"C&C27" 21' L.W.L.
"C&C27 trapper 500"
"C&C27 tall rig"
"Hinterhoeller"
Some archive file labels specify the term "LWL" after 21 and 22, so those must be waterline lengths for the model with an overall 27 foot length (C&C 27). The actual labelling varies: "Mark 22 1" 22' 3" LWL sloop", "Mark 21 1" 21' 0" LWL sloop" and "Mark 1 sloop". Could the 21'0" refer to our Mark 1 and 2, and the 22'3" to our Mark 3? I recall measuring 25 feet at the waterline last summer with a tape measure, but that must not be the marine architectural standard?
Would the iron ballast fo the C&C 27 Trapper 500 apply? My Mark II has a lead keel.
The "C&C 27 tall rig" sail plan presumably applies to my "Mark 2"?
The "'Hinterhoeller' accomodations" drawing presumably is just a standard C&C 27 accomodation?
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I emailed the curator at the Maritime Museum of the Great Lakes to see about copies of C&C 27 Mark II 1974 drawings. They wrote back that they only found two for a 1974: a sail plan and an accomodation plan, no mention of the Mark on them. They could research further for an hourly fee if I sent photos, or just send what they have for about $20. I would imagine that earlier Mark I drawings would apply to a 1974 Mark II, for the most part?
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
David wrote: "on the same hole spacing as is already present on the toerail, so no additional holes need to be drilled (just longer screws)."
Aha! That never occured to me, since nothing on a boat is supposed to be that easy. I will definitely look into this option more. Thanks.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I am having trouble picturing how the two toerail bolts go through the toerail, were I to buy the appropriate stanchions and move them out there.
Is the idea to drill new bolt holes through the toerail, exactly as if adding new toerail bolts except they pass through the stanchion base as well as the deck/hull seam?
Are the Mk II and Mk III toerails the same design?
Thanks.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
While awaiting David's opinion, here are some thoughts. I'm doing this with a Mk II 27, older sytle stachnion bases (4 bolts through the deck). My plan:
1. Removed all the bolts. They were stainless with aluminum backing plate, and there was some corrosion from dissimilar metals.
2. Checked the balsa core at every bolt hole. Some were epoxy cored, others not. The balsa is in amazingly good condition.
3. Drilled oversize holes and countersunk the top GRP skin and removed the core.
4. Next I plan to plug the lower skin smaller hole and fill the oversized hole with West epoxy hardneded with 404 thickener.
5. Then redrill the new holes.
6. Dremmel out better access to the inside bolt holes in the headliner - right now they are hard to get at.
7. Seal the bolts in their holes with butyl tape. There is controversy and no end of opinion about how to seal hardware deck bolt holes. I like butyl because it stays sticky for years, and allows some movement. Others may recommend a polysulphide. I have limited experience in two other boats.
8. Reapply the aluminum backing plates, but apply a little Duralac to try to separate the stainless steel and aluminum to prevent corrosion.
9. Snug the bolts down.
I am open to suggestions.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
Here is the muffler shelf. Do you think this the original design for the 1970s Mark II? <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/penguinfun/2958084438/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/penguinfun/2958084438/</a>
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
5200 is an adhesive, not a filler, and it will not give you a good surface to finish anyway. Epoxy can be used on polyester, and I tend to use epoxy to fill voids and cracks, after appropriate preparation.
But I cannot picture these cracks. Can you post a photo somewhere?
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
<p class="null" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
Here's a long-winded answer from a rank amateur. It is wise to seek expert opinion.
I'm doing this with a '74 Mark II, and have been on the learning curve. Exhaust replacement doesn't seem difficult, especially if one knows the existing design worked well and just needs to replace parts.
I got the old system dismantled, which is the first step. Perhaps the most critical is unbolting the exhaust flange from the manifold. Be patient if the bolts are corroded, to avoid breaking them. Don has a nice thread about how to deal with broken exhaust flange bolts. I got the bolts out with Kroil, gentle wrench work and time. Clean off the old gasket carefully and order a new one.
Once that's done, it's a matter of getting the old dry/wet stack and other components out of the boat, which I found very easy. If the old stack is wrapped in asbestos, use precautions when working with it (avoid inhaling fibers).
Right now I am working on the design, to ensure the replacements (1) will not create excessive backpressure (pipes or hoses too narrow, too many sharp bends, runs too long), and (2) will prevent water from backing up from the waterlift muffler into the manifold, wrecking the aft valves. If you know your present design has been working well, then you're half way there. This boat is new to me, so I'm spending more time on this design phase.
Sounds like the dry stack can be made from black iron nipples and elbows found in plumbing stores. If the old flange is salvageable, it can be used. The flange Don Moyer sells through MMI has a port for checking back pressure. I think Don uses never seize to get the pipe fittings tight. I imagine the key is to get the angles right when tightening the fittings. He sells a high temp protective coating on the stack to delay corrosion, before wrapping it with appropriate insulation. Stacks can also be made of galvanized steel or stainless steel, but there are compromises with those materials too. Not sure about brass or bronze. No exhaust stack lasts forever.
Presumably you have a waterlift muffler. I'm not sure about the age or inside condition of the metal muffler that came with this boat, so I am thinking about replacing it with a GRP or stainless model. GRP mufflers seem to be popular on many sailboats our size, but I can't figure out how to get enough distance from the raw water injection port on the dry stack to the muffler, to ensure the exhaust gasses are cool enough when they hit the muffler inlet. One manufacturer of a popular GRP muffler says 2 feet, as I recall, but check that.
MMI sells a compact stainless muffler with top ports. SS mufflers are more tolerant to heat, but it would still be important to ensure the gasses are cooled sufficiently that the muffler does not get too hot. My Mark II has a wooden shelf off to the side of the aft end of the engine. The shelf has a hole cut in it. I get the impression that this may have been a standard waterlift muffler location on the Mark II? Anyway, it now occurs to me that design seems to offer built-in air insulation for a warm muffler.
The MMI SS muffler outlet port requires 2" ID hose, which means I would have to upgrade the transom throughull to handle the larger hose (current one is 1.5" ID). I should rebed that through hull anyway, and add a flap to prevent pooping waves from flushing into the muffler. The larger hose would lower back pressure, if that is an issue. His model also has a drain to allow removal of accumulated exhaust water for winterizing or to reduce water volume in the muffler during a hard start. Commonly available GRP waterlifts do not seem to have that drain feature.
Some objectives in fitting components together are to ensure heat from the dry stack doesn't damage surrounding surfaces, joints don't leak noxious gasses and liquids, and components are well supported to prevent racking loose while under way. I plan to double clamp proper exhaust hoses with SS T clamps, for example, and build a support bracket for the dry/wet stack.
Some references I found useful:
<a href="http://www.boatus.com/goodoldboat/Marine_exhaust.asp">http://www.boatus.com/goodoldboat/Marine_exhaust.asp</a>
<a href="http://www.yachtsurvey.com/exhaust_risers.htm">http://www.yachtsurvey.com/exhaust_risers.htm</a>
<a href="http://www.moyermarine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2772">http://www.moyermarine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2772</a>
<a href="http://www.moyermarine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2317">http://www.moyermarine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2317</a>
<a href="http://www.yanmarhelp.com/i_exhaust.htm">http://www.yanmarhelp.com/i_exhaust.htm</a> (diesel, but principles similar).
Update:
<a href="http://www.abycinc.org/committees/P-01.pdf">http://www.abycinc.org/committees/P-01.pdf</a>
I get the impression that the C&C 27 design is kinder to exhaust systems than many sailboats in this size range. The other factor in our favour is that the Atomic 4 is not a powerful engine, which cuts us a bit of slack. But Don Moyer wrote that backpressure problems are common in sailboat A4 installations, so I plan to check the pressure after I get the new exhaust in place.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
1. If anyone has a photo of a C&C 27 or similar with a waterlift muffler midships behind the engine over the stuffing box, I would like to see it. There is no sign that one had been placed there on this boat, and engineering a shelf for one would be a lot of work. Plus I don't want to block access to the stuffing box.
2, There is a small aluminum bracket that lightly screws to two asymmetrical wooden blocks GRP'd to the hull on either side of the stuffing box. The bracket extends down to surround the stuffing box, and the upper surface does not look like it ever played a role in support a waterlift. That bracket is a mystery too - I can't figure out its purpose.
3. The other mystery is the original purpose of the wooden shelf off to port of the aft of the engine that currently supports the waterlift. It looks like it was built into the hull, and has a hole in the center presumably to open the shelf under the base of the waterlift. If it was a battery shelft, it would not have a hole there. Is it possible this Mark II originally had a waterlift there?
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
I understand this is why MMI calme up with the modified thermostat housing: to accomodate the cheaper thermostats that are taller. Inital higher cost to either raise the housing or replace it with the taller one, and from then on thermostats are cheaper.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
David, in that original setup, was the waterlift's inlet lower than the manifold outlet? Yesterday evening I studied the dimensions carefully on this boat, and I cannot picture a waterlift muffler in there over the stuffing box that allows for a downward sloping elbow. The hot (dry) exhaust pipe would have to loop up to the maximum allowed by the underside of the cockpit floor (about 6" vertical lift max) and then down to the muffler inlet. That's what the boat currently used: a pipe section with those dimensions leading to the muffler placed on the shelf to port of the aft of the engine, so I would not gain much. Fortunately the static waterline is below both the manifold outlet and the waterlift inlet.
There is surprisingly little about exhaust designs for this type of C&C on the Net. I would like to learn more about the original exhaust setup, and design options since then. I guess the good news might be that this boat design is fairly robust in terms of exhaust layouts, since there are few negative stories about it. There must be quite a few still running A4s.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
David, I like that plan the best. MMI's waterlift is smaller and should fit in there well, allowing me to build a proper SS elbow that runs downhill to the waterlift from the manifold keeping everything midships with fewer bends and shorter runs, all of which seems to be the preferred design.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit
From what I can tell on the Internet, it looks like the original A4 exhaust on these boats ran directly aft to the transom, which makes more sense. Perhaps they used a jacketed muffler that sloped down and directly aft?
I found the photos of Hyperion and Towser's systems for their diesels, and the stuff on Moyer's site, but I am interested in other ideas folks have about optimum design of A4 exhaust for this boat.
---------
"New" 1974 C&C 27 Mk II undergoing refit